Monday, 6 October 2014
ASEAN integration seen to boost markets for Philippines organic rice produce
Leo Cañeda, coordinator of the Department of Agriculture (DA)-led National Organic Agriculture Board, said producers of organic farm products could tap key cities or areas within ASEAN as primary target for market expansion when the region’s economic integration eventually rolls out.
He said products like organic high-value vegetables and rice produced in Region 12 or the Soccsksargen Region could take the lead in the export expansion.
The region comprises the provinces of South Cotabato, Sultan Kudarat, Sarangani, North Cotabato and the cities of General Santos, Koronadal, Tacurong, Kidapawan and Cotabato.
“There’s so much opportunities and advantages for our organic farmers in the ASEAN economic integration,” he said at the opening of the four-day 1st Soccsksargen Region Organic Agriculture Congress and Trade Fair here on Wednesday.
But Cañeda said organic farmers or producers should be prepared and equipped with the proper skills and knowledge so they can properly market their products in the ASEAN.
He specifically cited the proper quality standards and other related requirements for organic export products.
ASEAN created a special task force last year to lead the development and promotion of the region’s standards on organic agriculture.
The task force is specifically working on the crafting of a common standard agreeable to and recognized by the ASEAN member-states to facilitate the trading of organic products in the region.
Region 12 has around 50 hectares of palay areas that are mainly producing organic premium rice varieties for exports.
Last year, the area’s organic rice producers have started exporting black rice and other colored, long grained and aromatic rice varieties to the Middle East and Singapore.
DA Region 12 is currently working for the entry of locally-produced premium rice to major markets in Russia, Italy, United States and other parts of the Middle East.
Wednesday, 29 January 2014
Rice smuggling, WTO and Philippine law
As we wait for the answer, the Bureau of Customs (BOC) declared that it would release the seized rice shipments because of injunctions from three courts in Davao, Batangas and Manila ordering it to do so.
These injunctions were based on a WTO document that states that Philippine rice import restrictions expired on June 30, 2012. Therefore, all rice shipped to the Philippines after this date do not need import permits and, consequently, are not smuggled.
We will argue here that this is a misguided understanding of WTO. There is no contradiction between our WTO commitment and Philippine law. I know this because of my background as former DTI and DA undersecretary, presidential flagship secretary under the Office of the President, and vice president for Asia of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
WTO
It is necessary to understand WTO. I will quote here direct statements from the WTO website (www.wto.org). WTO has given us the flexibility to extend this deadline. We have done so, and the import restrictions are now in effect. The 2,000 smuggled rice containers seized by BOC are therefore smuggled. This should not be released back to the smugglers, as what is happening today.
The website states: “WTO is a rules-based, member-driven organization—all decisions are made by the member-governments, and the rules are the outcome of negotiations among members.” There is a special section in WTO called the “Agreement on Agriculture.” It states that this agreement “allows some flexibility in the way commitments are implemented.” How is this done?
The topmost WTO decision-making body is the Ministerial Conference. This “can take decisions on all matters under any of the multilateral trade agreements.” As a private sector agricultural representative of the Philippine delegation to a previous WTO Ministerial Conference held in Hong Kong, I witnessed this firsthand. The most recent one occurred last December 2013 in Bali, Indonesia.
Bali Package
The Ministers “adopted the Bali Package, a series of decisions made at streamlining trade, allowing developing countries more options for providing food security, boosting least developed countries’ trade, and helping development more generally.”
Following the WTO objectives of food security and development, the Philippines notified the WTO that it was extending rice import restrictions beyond the 2012 deadline. We exercised our negotiating flexibility to extend this to 2017. Our official negotiations are now going on. At the Bali Conference, this was recognized. There were no objections made.
Therefore, the import restrictions mandated by Philippine Law currently implemented by the BOC do not in any way contradict WTO. Perhaps, some misguided elements should consult the WTO website, which records the WTO Bali Ministerial Conference agreements to understand this better.
In addition, for us to lift rice import restrictions, a WTO member should bring this issue to WTO Dispute Settlement, secure a decision against our stand, and wait until we amend our law to conform to this decision. Not even one of these three steps has occurred. It is therefore very clear that rice import restrictions in the Philippines fully recognized and accepted by WTO are in effect today. There is no contradiction between WTO and Philippine Law.
Since the three courts that ordered the injunctions may not be aware of this, they should attend immediately to the Solicitor General’s Motions for Reconsideration. The BOC should stop releasing these seized smuggled rice containers, which is making a mockery of the anti-smuggling drive. More importantly, this release that we are witnessing today loses government revenues, endangers our food security, damages the livelihood of three million rice farmers, and puts in reverse mode the inclusive growth strategy of our government.
Competence
“Kung walang corrupt, walang mahirap.” Many rice farmers believe that much corruption has entered both the executive and legislative branches of the government. But in addition to fighting this corruption, the farmers contend that government should increase significantly its competence in dealing with issues such as rice smuggling.
Already, our farmer leaders have submitted documented charges to the Supreme Court and the Ombudsman to protest this travesty of justice shown by the release of smuggled rice shipments back to the smugglers. With increased government competence, it should no longer be necessary for poor farmers to risk their safety and meager resources in fighting for what should have been given them if government competence were at the desired level.
Read more: http://business.inquirer.net/161897/rice-smuggling-wto-and-philippine-law#ixzz2rm3xOgzL
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
Thursday, 3 January 2013
Philippines Government still undecided on rice imports
Agriculture Secretary Proceso J. Alcala said the National Food Authority (NFA) council may not decide on rice imports this month.
“[The Philippines] does not need [a big volume] of rice. Hindi tayo nagmamadali [We are not in a hurry]. We will make an announcement [on rice imports] possibly [in late] January or early February,” Alcala said.
The agriculture chief said that many palay (unhusked-rice) farmers were encouraged to plant a third crop under the early-cropping scheme of the government.
Under this scheme, farmers were enjoined to plant a month earlier or by April for the wet cropping season in 2012. Harvest then started in August. The plan also called for a third cropping, which started in October.
The scheme also enjoined farmers to avoid the period when strong typhoons usually visit the country, according to the Department of Agriculture (DA).
The Philippines gets 60 percent of its annual palay harvest from the main wet-season cropping; the rest, from the dry-season cropping.
Earlier, Alcala said the DA is not keen on importing rice this year after a record palay harvest was projected last year.
According to the Bureau of Agricultural Statistics (BAS), the Philippines will increase its palay output by 7.7 percent on year to 17.98 million metric tons (MMT) for 2012.
Unmilled-rice output in July to December 2012 is projected to increase by 10.7 percent on year to 10.08 MMT.
Last year the government authorized the importation of 500,000 metric tons (MT) of rice, the bulk of which—380,000 MT—was purchased by the private sector. The NFA bought the rest.
The government entered the international rice market in March.
The 120,000 MT of rice bought by the NFA augmented its stocks as per its mandate to have 30 days’ worth of stocks when the lean season for rice starts in July.
Monday, 22 November 2010
Philippines sets 2011 rice output goal at 17.4-M tons
Philippines May Import Rice in Early 2011
Wednesday, 17 November 2010
Philippines Rice stocks up by more than a quarter
Monday, 6 September 2010
Cambodia planning to sell rice to Philippines
Friday, 20 August 2010
Importation needed to solve Philippines' rice shortage
Thursday, 19 August 2010
Philippines may import rice this year
Thursday, 24 June 2010
Philippines' 11 of 16 regions to register palay-production cuts in Q2
Rice stock rises by nearly a fourth, but corn drops
Tuesday, 1 June 2010
Rice Losses in Philippines Bigger Than Estimated
Philippines to stop Rice purchase for 2009-2010
Tuesday, 11 May 2010
Philippines Government says yield is up, but 'where's the rice?'
Frisco M. Malabanan, national coordinator of the GMA (Ginintuang Masaganang Ani) Rice Program, says rice production has been rising since President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo took office in 2001.
This is supported by data from the Bureau of Agricultural Statistics (BAS) that indicate a steady increase in palay productionfrom 12.95 metric tons per hectare in 2001 to 16.24 MT per hectare in 2007.
The assessment of Estrelita Mariano, spokesperson for the rice price watch group Bantay Bigas, is quite the opposite.
Mariano, who served as secretary general of Amihan National Federation of Peasant Women in the 1990s, believes that the government projects a totally different picture of the agricultural situation.
"Government assistance to farmers is hardly noticeable, and whatever program that Gloria talks about is mainly for show and does very little to help the Filipino farmer," she says.
Ms Arroyo announced in 2001 at the onset of her term her plans to develop the agriculture sector to provide a million jobs.
"We will approach this with a sense of urgency," she said in her 2001 State of the Nation Address. "I do not want the one million new jobs to come in the long term. I want a timetable. I want to identify accountabilities. I want milestones," Arroyo said. "Cheap rice and productive farmersthese are our goals for the people."
Romeo Royandoyan, executive director of the Philippine Center for Rural Development Studies (Centro Saka), says the Arroyo administration has failed to meet its targets, blaming this on its lack of sincerity to promote self-sufficiency.
"A policy conflict exists when the government encourages massive land-use conversion and increased rice production, farmer self-reliance and dependence on foreign-provided hybrid seeds. This only benefits the big shots, the multinational corporations, and is detrimental to ordinary farmers," he says.
In April 2008, the country was engulfed in a global food shortage that sparked tensions in over 30 countries and threatened to drive more than 100 million people in the developing world deeper into poverty.
Causes of shortfall
The shortfall was blamed on climate change, booming population, new-found affluence that has put more food on the table in China and India, conversion of grains into biofuels, natural disasters in the United States, Australia and Bangladesh, and export restrictions by rice producers.
To ease the crisis, the Philippines went on a massive rice importation drive, selling the commodity at subsidized prices.
That same year, the Department of Agriculture launched its FIELDS program at the National Food Summit, focusing on the six most significant points of the agriculture sector: Fertilizer, irrigation, extension and education services, loans, dryers and post-harvest facilities, and seeds.
Part of the FIELDS program entailed a self-sufficiency goal to be attained this year.
However, when it appeared it could not be met, the target was moved to 2013, making it a burden of the next administration to tackle the long-running issue of food security.
Drop in fertilizer supply
One major problem was fertilizer supply.
According to the BAS, there was a drop in fertilizer supply disposition in 2008 that coincided with the Senate investigation of Agriculture Undersecretary Jocelyn "Joc-joc" Bolante in connection with the P728-million fertilizer scam.
Underscoring a major failure in the program to achieve self-sufficiency, the Senate inquiry revealed that the fertilizer fundsdistributed to Ms Arroyo's political allies during the harvest seasonwere essentially used to buy votes in the 2004 presidential elections.
The fertilizers were secured at an overprice of 682 percent, or by P128 million, according to the Commission on Audit.
The development of the agricultural sector has been identified by economists and academics as a key to mitigating poverty in this country.
A 2006 survey conducted by the National Statistical Coordination Board showed that more than 27 million Filipinos live below the poverty threshold, surviving on a dollar a day, according to a World Bank standard.
No longer self-sufficient
The problems in fertilizer are essentially tied to our loss in rice self-sufficiency, says Mariano.
"We are no longer self-sufficient nowadays because of a loss in traditional, regular seeds," she says.
Mariano says that the establishment of the International Rice Research Institute produced hybrid seed varieties that were expensive and required costly fertilizer.
"Increase in expenses forced farmers to borrow money, thus increasing their burden," she says.
For one, the government considers rice importation from Asian neighbors such as Vietnam and Thailand a necessary step in achieving food security, as high a priority as achieving self-sufficiency.
This means that while the FIELDS program is being implemented, the Philippines will continue to import rice.
Imports not an issue
According to Milo de los Reyes, GMA Corn Program Secretariat, food security should not be an issue of importation versus self-sufficiency.
"It's all about management of supply and use. We have to make sure we are food-secured first by improving farmer productivity and increasing farmer's income. Then if necessary, we import," he says.
The government puts a prime emphasis on rice production as a measure of agricultural progress, he says. The higher the output rate, the better.
De los Reyes admits self-sufficiency may be a difficult goal to fully achieve because of the country's burgeoning population. "You can't manage or control resources if you have an increasing population every year," he says.
However, when asked if he thought the GMA Rice and Corn Programs, along with FIELDS, was a success, he unhesitatingly said, "Yes, it is."
Better than global average
Emerson Yago, science research specialist and spokesperson for the GMA Rice Program, points to the DA's positive production levels. They have been increasing over the years until 2009, he said, when Ondoy and Pepeng caused heavy damage to agricultural crops.
Yago says that annual agricultural growth was even higher than global figures, which meant that the country was even doing better than the global average.
According to the Philippine Rice Masterplan for 2009-2013, local annual growth from 2000 to 2008 was 3.07 percent, compared to global growth of 1.45 percent.
This doesn't necessarily mean much for the farmers like Marquez, who does not see improvements in his rice yields.
Cathy Estavillo, current Amihan secretary general, also weighs in on the government's glaring deficiencies in the agriculture sector.
Estavillo believes that above anything else, agricultural reform should encompass agrarian reform as well as the country's withdrawal from the World Trade Organization, in keeping with her rejection of agricultural economic liberalization.
"We understand the government's policies and programs are very good. But the government has done nothing to realize them. The question to ask is: How willing is the government to actually promote agricultural reform?" she says.
One meal a day
"Go to any province in the country and you will see what I mean. Families have barely enough to feed their children. Mothers feed their children porridge in the evening, the only meal of the day, and water for breakfast, because that's all they can afford to eat. It's very sad," she explains.
Royandoyan has spent years battling it out in agriculture hearings in Congress, trying to convince bureaucrats to reverse the government's market-oriented approach to agriculture.
He is especially concerned with the country's stubborn insistence on depending on the world's rice stock, which he explains is shockingly less than 7 percent.
"When another rice crisis looms, 5 to 6 percent of that figure will go to China's supply. What will the Filipinos eat then?"
